References

Breznau, Nate et al. 2022. “Observing Many Researchers Using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Uncertainty.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (44).

Gelman, Andrew, and Eric Loken. 2013. The Garden of Forking Paths: Why Multiple Comparisons Can Be a Problem, Even When There Is No "Fishing Expedition" or "p-Hacking" and the Research Hypothesis Was Posited Ahead of Time. Department of Statistics, Columbia University.

Klau, Simon, Sabine Hoffmann, Chirag J. Patel, John P. A. Ioannidis, and Anne-Laure Boulesteix. 2021. “Examining the Robustness of Observational Associations to Model, Measurement and Sampling Uncertainty with the Vibration of Effects Framework.” International Journal of Epidemiology 50 (1): 266–78.

Patel, Chirag J., Belinda Burford, and John P. A. Ioannidis. 2015. “Assessment of Vibration of Effects Due to Model Specification Can Demonstrate the Instability of Observational Associations.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 68 (9): 1046–58.

Silberzahn, Raphael et al. 2018. “Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (3): 337–56.

Simmons, Joseph P., Leif D. Nelson, and Uri Simonsohn. 2011. “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant.” Psychological Science 22 (11): 1359–66.

Simonsohn, Uri, Joseph P. Simmons, and Leif D. Nelson. 2020. “Specification Curve Analysis.” Nature Human Behaviour 4: 1208–14.

Steegen, Sara, Francis Tuerlinckx, Andrew Gelman, and Wolf Vanpaemel. 2016. “Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (5): 702–12.